<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kbps &#187; Opera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/tag/opera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com</link>
	<description>A blog about Ubuntu, typography, and contemporary technologies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Opera Border Radius in 2010?</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/09/12/opera-border-radius-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/09/12/opera-border-radius-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opera has been maybe the most standards-conscious browser over its lifetime. This has resulted in frustration among users, who believe it to be “broken” because it doesn’t render lazy code correctly — code that takes advantage of the forgiveness of other browsers, allowing you to write sloppily and get away with it. But it has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera has been maybe the most standards-conscious browser over its lifetime.  This has resulted in frustration among users, who believe it to be “broken” because it doesn’t render lazy code correctly — code that takes advantage of the forgiveness of other browsers, allowing you to write sloppily and get away with it.</p>
<p>But it has also resulted in frustration among web developers, who are impatient at Opera’s reluctance to adopt any standards that haven’t been laser-etched into platinum tablets down in the W3C’s basement foundry.  Among them is the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-border-radius">border-radius</a> property, an effect that will probably be out of vogue anyway by the time Opera’s Presto engine implements it.  Of course, since CSS3 has been kicked around the W3C offices since <em><a href="http://www.w3.org/1999/06/WD-css3-iccprof-19990623">1999</a></em>, and border-radius itself since <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-css3-box-20010726/#the-border">2001</a>, most other engines (Gecko, WebKit, KHTML) stopped waiting and began inventing their own properties for this effect.  <strong>Presto has not</strong>.</p>
<p>In the course of reminding myself of this lamentable fact by searching for workarounds today, I noticed that some Opera developers are casually dropping hints that the full-blown, unqualified, W3C-crafted <strong>border-radius</strong> itself <a href="http://dev.opera.com/forums/topic/258986?t=1252795344&#038;page=1#comment2936734">has made an appearance</a> in Presto 2.3, and that <a href="http://www.opera.com/browser/next/">the next version of Opera</a> will be <a href="http://my.opera.com/dragonfly/blog/scope-protocol-specification#comment9599557">powered by 2.4</a>.</p>
<p>It’s all true, <a href="http://twitter.com/andreasbovens/statuses/3306977492">I saw it on Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/09/12/opera-border-radius-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Firefox Badges!</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/07/04/new-firefox-badges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/07/04/new-firefox-badges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I felt that these didn’t get specific enough, so here are some custom messages for users of other browsers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt that <a href="http://livetolaugh85.blogspot.com/2009/06/upgrade-to-firefox-35-shaking-up.html">these</a> didn’t get specific enough, so here are some custom messages for users of other browsers.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/stuff/firefox-badge-safari.png" alt="firefox-badge-safari" title="firefox-badge-safari" width="158" height="274" class="size-full wp-image-2274" hspace="2" /><img src="http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/stuff/firefox-badge-opera.png" alt="firefox-badge-opera" title="firefox-badge-opera" width="158" height="274" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2273" hspace="2" /><img src="http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/stuff/firefox-badge-chrome.png" alt="firefox-badge-chrome" title="firefox-badge-chrome" width="158" height="274" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2272" hspace="2" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/07/04/new-firefox-badges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

