<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kbps &#187; Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com</link>
	<description>A blog about Destroyer, foobar2000, and Last.fm.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>How to Save One, Many, or All Items from a Google Reader Feed Locally</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/11/29/how-to-save-one-many-or-all-items-from-a-google-reader-feed-locally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/11/29/how-to-save-one-many-or-all-items-from-a-google-reader-feed-locally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[archivism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Greasemonkey]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/11/29/how-to-save-one-many-or-all-items-from-a-google-reader-feed-locally/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Reader, employing Google&#8217;s petabytes of storage, archives every feed item it&#8217;s ever pulled for you.  This has always amazed me, as I&#8217;m sure I and everyone else must be using far more in Reader than the 5 gigs we get from Gmail.  Still, they don&#8217;t have much of a choice; it wouldn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://reader.google.com/">Google Reader</a>, employing Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.10/cloudware.html">petabytes</a> of storage, archives every feed item it&#8217;s ever pulled for you.  This has always amazed me, as I&#8217;m sure I and everyone else must be using far more in Reader than the 5 gigs we get from Gmail.  Still, they don&#8217;t have much of a choice; it wouldn&#8217;t do anybody good if you could only see the 10 or 20 items present on a feed&#8217;s <span class="caps">XML</span> file at any given time.  And even though they&#8217;re probably clever enough to only have to store one copy of every item for that item&#8217;s hundreds of thousands of readers, they&#8217;ve practically built a third copy of the internet (after their&nbsp;<a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/07/useful-google-bookmarklets.html">cache</a>).</p>
<p>A nice fallout of this archiving is that whenever content you&#8217;ve subscribed to disappears from the web, you&#8217;ll still be able to access its (admittedly homogenized) Reader copy, forever; &#8220;forever&#8221; here meaning &#8220;presumably for as long as Google is around.&#8221;  When (if?) Google dies, will its data die with it?  Despite my intuition that Google will long outlast current notions of what computers are and how they work, I still don&#8217;t like entrusting important data to other people, not to mention data that is accessible only through the web.  I want a <strong>local&nbsp;copy</strong>.</p>
<p>But they don&#8217;t make it easy for you.  Reader is all AJAXed out, so even simple page saves don&#8217;t work.  Copying/pasting would be a nightmare.  Screenshots?  Too sloppy.  Emailing copies of each item?  Too time-consuming.  Tagging them with a special tag, making that tag&#8217;s feed public, then subscribing in, like, Thunderbird or something?  Even if that weren&#8217;t absurdly roundabout, the public feeds only have twenty or so&nbsp;items.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m talking specifically about a blog I loved, but that up and disappeared one day, completely, leaving the only copies of the lost data scattered throughout Netvibes, Newsgator, Bloglines, and Reader.  Google searches turned up nothing like a straightforward guide to saving from Reader, which surprised me.  But there were clues, and using only a couple tools, I finally got it.  It&#8217;s actually pretty easy, I was able to save 118 items in about ten minutes with this method.  <em>Let me show you&nbsp;it.</em></p>
<p>You need <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/">Firefox</a>, the two plugins <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/748">Greasemonkey</a> and <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/427">ScrapBook</a>, and the Greasemonkey script <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/10054">Google Reader Print Button</a>.  Then it&#8217;s just a matter of clicking &#8220;Print&#8221; for each item you want to save, which opens it in its own tab, then using ScrapBook&#8217;s &#8220;Capture All Tabs&#8230;&#8221; function, which automatically does a &#8220;Save Page As, Web Page, complete&#8221; into your <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/support/firefox/edit#appdata">%AppData%</a> folder for each tab, then finally optionally using ScrapBook&#8217;s &#8220;Combine Wizard&#8221; (in the tools menu of the ScrapBook sidebar [Alt+K]) to put all the items into a single folder with a single index.html&nbsp;file.</p>
<p>The &#8220;printing&#8221; part is the most cumbersome, but goes by pretty quickly with the repetition of a series of clicks and&nbsp;keystrokes:</p>
<ol type="1" class="short">
<li>Click&nbsp;&#8220;Print&#8221;</li>
<li>Press Esc (to close the print&nbsp;dialogue)</li>
<li>Press Ctrl+Tab (to get back to&nbsp;Reader)</li>
<li>Press J (to go to the next feed&nbsp;item)</li>
</ol>
<p>Do that mindlessly for a couple minutes, and they&#8217;ll all be there, waiting to be saved.  I&#8217;m gonna put the word &#8220;disk&#8221; in here too so that anybody Googling for a solution might find&nbsp;this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/11/29/how-to-save-one-many-or-all-items-from-a-google-reader-feed-locally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3 Rendering Improvements</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/09/10/firefox-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/09/10/firefox-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/09/10/firefox-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox 3 is scheduled to be released later this fall; I haven&#8217;t really been following its development, but one thing I have heard about and am excited about is its (or, more accurately, Gecko&#8217;s) new graphics library,&#160;Cairo.

First I heard that it would resample rather than simply rescale images, as demonstrated in the image above (via [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3/Schedule">Firefox 3</a> is scheduled to be released later this fall; I haven&#8217;t really been following its development, but one thing I have heard about and am excited about is its (or, more accurately, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecko_%28layout_engine%29">Gecko</a>&#8217;s) new graphics library,&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cairo_%28graphics%29">Cairo</a>.</p>
<p><img src='http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/stuff/cairoimages.png' alt='Cairo Image Resizing' class="center" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.qotile.net/blog/wp/?p=448">First</a> I heard that it would resample rather than simply rescale images, as demonstrated in the image above (via <a href="http://www.actsofvolition.com/archives/2006/december/scalingimages">Acts of&nbsp;Volition</a>).</p>
<p>Later I learned that it will also render fonts more smoothly.  I enjoy the soft way pages look in <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">Safari for Windows</a>, the result of a different rendering engine, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit">WebKit</a>, so this is something I&#8217;m really looking forward to.  Here&#8217;s an example of Cairo&#8217;s font rendering, as seen in Camino 1.2+ for Mac, via&nbsp;<a href="http://www.hicksdesign.co.uk/journal/cairo-beats-safari">hicksdesign</a>:</p>
<p><img src='http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/stuff/cairofonts.png' alt='Cairo Font Rendering' class="center" /></p>
<p>There are <a href="http://joelonsoftware.com/items/2007/06/12.html">very specific reasons</a> for the intentional differences in these approaches to font rendering.  It&#8217;s a matter of personal preference, and I think my preference will be for Cairo.  <a href="http://www.brokenkode.com/archives/font-rendering/">Some are floored</a> by the superiority of WebKit, and designer Jeffrey Zeldman makes <a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/">a solid, objective case for it</a>; <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000884.html">others are&nbsp;horrified</a>.</p>
<p>Finally, Gecko&#8217;s non-standard <span class="caps">CSS</span> attribute <tt><a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/CSS:-moz-border-radius">-moz-border-radius</a></tt>, a precursor to <a href="http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work#CSS3"><span class="caps">CSS3</span></a>&#8217;s <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-border/#the-border-radius"><tt>border-radius</tt> attribute</a>, will make image-less rounded div corners easy and pretty (via <a href="http://www.actsofvolition.com/archives/2006/december/cairocornersin">Acts of&nbsp;Volition</a>):</p>
<p><img src='http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/stuff/cairocorners.png' alt='Cario Border Radius' class="center" /></p>
<p>I would have posted screenshots of my own, but I don&#8217;t trust these alpha builds not to eff things&nbsp;up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/09/10/firefox-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox &#8220;Phrase Not Found&#8221; Noise</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2006/08/17/firefox-phrase-not-found-noise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2006/08/17/firefox-phrase-not-found-noise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[annoyances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbps.resounder.org/2006/08/17/firefox-phrase-not-found-noise/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Praise&#160;Jesus.
One of the handiest features in Firefox, and one that I use frequently and absent-mindedly, is the &#8220;find as you type&#8221; shortcut.  Press forward slash, and Firefox will jump to the next text that matches what you type; press single-quote, and Firefox will jump to the next link text that matches what you type. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Praise&nbsp;Jesus.</p>
<p>One of the handiest features in Firefox, and one that I use frequently and absent-mindedly, is the &#8220;find as you type&#8221; shortcut.  Press forward slash, and Firefox will jump to the next text that matches what you type; press single-quote, and Firefox will jump to the next <em>link</em> text that matches what you type.  So fast and&nbsp;invaluable.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, if the string you type turns up no results, Firefox alerts you with what sounds like <a href="http://kb.mozillazine.org/Accessibility.typeaheadfind.soundURL">&#8220;a hoarse dog barking.&#8221;</a>  Not just once, but for <em>every subsequent character</em> that confirms your search failure: a curse for fast&nbsp;typists.</p>
<p>This annoyance was not even solved by <a href="http://www.indev.no/?p=projects#flashmute">FlashMute</a> [<a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/downloads/download-of-the-day-flashmute-194339.php">via</a>], a tiny and amazing program that mutes all sounds originating from your browser, or just those from embedded flash&nbsp;objects.</p>
<p>After not trying very hard to find a solution via Google, I thought &#8220;what the hell&#8221; and went to about:config.  Searched for &#8220;sound,&#8221; and voilà.  &#8220;accessibility.typeaheadfind.enablesound&#8221;.  Double-click once, restart Firefox, and no longer will you be plagued by the hoarse&nbsp;dog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2006/08/17/firefox-phrase-not-found-noise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox, video, MST3K</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2005/02/28/firefox-video-mst3k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2005/02/28/firefox-video-mst3k/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jimmy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[haha]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MST3K]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resounder.org/kbps/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I still don&#8217;t get why Firefox is better and more popular than Mozilla ever was, but okay, I&#8217;ll play along.  Especially given these&#160;enhancements:

Cookie Button: one of the best features of Mozilla that inexplicably didn&#8217;t make it to&#160;Firefox.
Flashblock: Only see Flash when you want to!  This is a&#160;miracle.

Finally found a video player to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/joel.gif" alt="Joel" class="center" /></p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t get why <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">Firefox</a> is better and more popular than <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/mozilla1.x/">Mozilla</a> ever was, but okay, I&#8217;ll play along.  Especially given these&nbsp;enhancements:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.extensionsmirror.nl/index.php?showtopic=329">Cookie Button</a>: one of the best features of Mozilla that inexplicably didn&#8217;t make it to&nbsp;Firefox.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.extensionsmirror.nl/index.php?showtopic=45">Flashblock</a>: Only see Flash when you want to!  This is a&nbsp;miracle.</li>
</ul>
<p>Finally found a video player to be happy with: <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/guliverkli/">Media Player Classic</a>.  It&#8217;s also bundled with <a href="http://home.hccnet.nl/h.edskes/finalbuilds.htm#realalt">Real Alternative</a>, which allows you to play Real format files without relying on the nightmarish RealOne player.  This week I also discovered <a href="http://www.xi-soft.com/download.htm">Net Transport</a>, which does the best (i.e., quickest, easiest, and most free) job of saving streaming video I&#8217;ve seen so far. And finally, <span class="caps">MST3K</span> is still kicking: there&#8217;s <a href="http://mst3k.booyaka.com/">this gigantic reference site</a>, <a href="http://www.mst3kinfo.com/">the still-existent info club</a>, and <a href="http://mst3k.nofadz.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=58">a legally ambiguous ShoutCast video stream</a>.&nbsp;Shhhhhhhh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2005/02/28/firefox-video-mst3k/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
