<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kbps &#187; Boing Boing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/tag/boing-boing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com</link>
	<description>A blog about Destroyer, foobar2000, and Last.fm.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Boing Boing&#160;Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2006/08/15/boing-boing-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2006/08/15/boing-boing-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Boing Boing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbps.resounder.org/2006/08/15/boing-boing-sucks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m starting to really resent Boing Boing for taking up so much space in my aggregator.  I kept it there begrudgingly, for the dwindling handful of interesting posts that I&#8217;d probably hear about elsewhere anyway.  But for every interesting post, there are ten totally boring posts about DRM, ten totally boring posts about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to really resent Boing Boing for taking up so much space in my aggregator.  I kept it there begrudgingly, for the dwindling handful of interesting posts that I&#8217;d probably hear about elsewhere anyway.  But for every interesting post, there are ten totally boring posts about DRM, ten totally boring posts about Disney, ten totally boring posts about a useless toy, and ten totally boring posts about how to turn your lawnmower into, I don&#8217;t know, a GPS lawnmower or something.  Not to mention their smug self-absorption, and their inability to separate entertainment from politics.  As an example of the latter, <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/08/14/robin_williams_plays.html">this recent post</a> describes an anti-Bush Robin Williams movie as &#8220;look[ing] like a hell of a movie.&#8221;  In fact, the movie looks shitty, but because it lambasts politics, it is heralded by Boing&nbsp;Boing.</p>
<p>And now I&#8217;m reminded of the time during the World Cup that <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/06/03/hideous_company_send.html">they said&nbsp;this</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t even know what the FIFA World Cup is. I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s soccer, which I hate just as much as any other pro sport. Every editor at Boing Boing detests professional sports, and we would sooner stream a video of a crumpled up paper napkin in the corner of a room than show some jackasses running after a ball. The only time we would ever post anything about pro-sports would be to make fun of&nbsp;them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you so self-righteous that you think we care about how much you hate sports, while at the same time you worship all things <em>Disney</em> fer&nbsp;chrissake?</p>
<p>And why do you force your readers to use <em>Google</em> to search your site, yielding unorganized heaps of results?  And why do you force your readers to blog about you in Technorati-registered blogs in order to &#8220;comment&#8221; on your&nbsp;posts?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had enough, I&#8217;ll just have to get by without that weekly interesting post about a glowing fish or&nbsp;something.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.corysucks.com/">I should have known I&#8217;m not&nbsp;alone</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2006/08/15/boing-boing-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
