<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Ubuntu Lucid Look: An Appraisal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/</link>
	<description>A blog about Ubuntu, typography, and contemporary technologies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting to the bottom of the buttons &#124; Words and pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/#comment-24766</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting to the bottom of the buttons &#124; Words and pictures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2480#comment-24766</guid>
		<description>[...] has been a lot of discussion about the experimental move of the window buttons (maximise, minimise, close) from the right hand [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] has been a lot of discussion about the experimental move of the window buttons (maximise, minimise, close) from the right hand […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design hier, Design da &#8211; ich will auch mal was sagen! &#124; picomol.de</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/#comment-24384</link>
		<dc:creator>Design hier, Design da &#8211; ich will auch mal was sagen! &#124; picomol.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2480#comment-24384</guid>
		<description>[...] so cooool, usw&#8230;&#8221; Nur wenige Beiträge sind wirklich zielführend, andere wiederum sind ziemlich interessant und können auch als Verbesserungsvorschläge aufgefasst [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] so cooool, usw…” Nur wenige Beiträge sind wirklich zielführend, andere wiederum sind ziemlich interessant und können auch als Verbesserungsvorschläge aufgefasst […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmdline &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Here we fucking go again…</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/#comment-24106</link>
		<dc:creator>cmdline &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Here we fucking go again…</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 05:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2480#comment-24106</guid>
		<description>[...] not just being picky, here&#8217;s a few more people who&#8217;d like to weigh in: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] not just being picky, here’s a few more people who’d like to weigh in: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Only design can save Linux &#171; Silicoholic</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/#comment-24105</link>
		<dc:creator>Only design can save Linux &#171; Silicoholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 04:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2480#comment-24105</guid>
		<description>[...] about Ubuntu prettyness Ubuntu Artwork Page 16 Things that can be improved in Ubuntu 10.04 The new Ubuntu Lucid look Ubuntu dumps brown and instroduces new theme Objectified documentary: clip about Apple (this is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] about Ubuntu prettyness Ubuntu Artwork Page 16 Things that can be improved in Ubuntu 10.04 The new Ubuntu Lucid look Ubuntu dumps brown and instroduces new theme Objectified documentary: clip about Apple (this is […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James1st</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/#comment-23394</link>
		<dc:creator>James1st</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2480#comment-23394</guid>
		<description>Overall this was a good article. But I have one complaint. That being your negative comment relative to pimples. You have the option to like or dislike pimples, that is your freedom of choice. But don&#039;t attempt to force your bias on others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall this was a good article. But I have one complaint. That being your negative comment relative to pimples. You have the option to like or dislike pimples, that is your freedom of choice. But don’t attempt to force your bias on others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AgravatedDOShead</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/#comment-23034</link>
		<dc:creator>AgravatedDOShead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 03:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2480#comment-23034</guid>
		<description>AAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH. What Bleeping Idiot defaulted the buttons to the WRONG side of the screen? Change for Changes Sake just ain&#039;t good... take the US Government for example... we voted for change... and that&#039;s all that&#039;s left from our bucks... TO FIX IT.... use Alt+F2 to bring up the Run Application dialog, and type in gconf-editor  to launch the Gnome Configuration Editor... and find the key apps \ metacity \ general... and for the buttons_layout section, change it to read :minimize,maximize,close and now your reflexes will work as 30 years of programming dictate... and replace all the crooks come election time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH. What Bleeping Idiot defaulted the buttons to the WRONG side of the screen? Change for Changes Sake just ain’t good… take the US Government for example… we voted for change… and that’s all that’s left from our bucks… TO FIX IT.… use Alt+F2 to bring up the Run Application dialog, and type in gconf-editor  to launch the Gnome Configuration Editor… and find the key apps \ metacity \ general… and for the buttons_layout section, change it to read :minimize,maximize,close and now your reflexes will work as 30 years of programming dictate… and replace all the crooks come election time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/#comment-22958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 22:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2480#comment-22958</guid>
		<description>IAB: In my post I make clear that I don&#039;t have a problem with buttons being on the left, and that of all the things to take issue with in this redesign, the button placement is not the most important.

I know that I can change my desktop to look however I want, but I want more than &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; desktop to look good -- I want the default desktop to look good right out of the box, for the purpose of attracting new users.

And, because I dislike the amateur stuff being peddled at GNOME-Look and similar sites, I did selfishly have my hopes up that Canonical would be able to produce the first theme I actually enjoyed using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IAB: In my post I make clear that I don’t have a problem with buttons being on the left, and that of all the things to take issue with in this redesign, the button placement is not the most important.</p>
<p>I know that I can change my desktop to look however I want, but I want more than <em>my</em> desktop to look good — I want the default desktop to look good right out of the box, for the purpose of attracting new users.</p>
<p>And, because I dislike the amateur stuff being peddled at GNOME-Look and similar sites, I did selfishly have my hopes up that Canonical would be able to produce the first theme I actually enjoyed using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IAB</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/#comment-22957</link>
		<dc:creator>IAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 21:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2480#comment-22957</guid>
		<description>While yes the buttons are default to be on the left, it is very easy to move them back to the right, and there are plenty of applications in the software center that would let you change and fix any and all of the things you are ranting about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While yes the buttons are default to be on the left, it is very easy to move them back to the right, and there are plenty of applications in the software center that would let you change and fix any and all of the things you are ranting about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/#comment-22845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 14:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2480#comment-22845</guid>
		<description>To the last couple commenters:

&quot;but for the ave­rage user…they don’t care.&quot;  I disagree.  In fact I think the average user cares a great deal how their desktop looks, or, at the very least, their opinion of an operating system is informed to a large extent by how the desktop looks.  They of course don&#039;t consciously examine pixel metrics and font hinting and gradients, etc., but they most likely notice them subconsciously, contributing to an vague un-ease with their computing environment.  All these little things add up to make a bad impression.

&quot;It is trivial for the user to change everything to the way each user wants it.&quot;  I also disagree with this.  While it&#039;s trivial to change among the pre-installed themes, knowing where to go for new themes and what to do with them once you&#039;ve got them is not &quot;trivial&quot; -- it&#039;s not difficult by any means, but it&#039;s something you have to look up the solution for.  And it&#039;s something you&#039;d only attempt to do after having decided to live in Ubuntu for a while -- a decision you&#039;re less likely to make if you&#039;re promptly turned off by the aesthetics of it.

There is no substitute for the experience of the first five minutes of using any piece of software, and if Ubuntu is going to convince people to give it a chance, it needs to be more attractive by default than it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the last couple commenters:</p>
<p>“but for the ave­rage user…they don’t care.”  I disagree.  In fact I think the average user cares a great deal how their desktop looks, or, at the very least, their opinion of an operating system is informed to a large extent by how the desktop looks.  They of course don’t consciously examine pixel metrics and font hinting and gradients, etc., but they most likely notice them subconsciously, contributing to an vague un-ease with their computing environment.  All these little things add up to make a bad impression.</p>
<p>“It is trivial for the user to change everything to the way each user wants it.”  I also disagree with this.  While it’s trivial to change among the pre-installed themes, knowing where to go for new themes and what to do with them once you’ve got them is not “trivial” — it’s not difficult by any means, but it’s something you have to look up the solution for.  And it’s something you’d only attempt to do after having decided to live in Ubuntu for a while — a decision you’re less likely to make if you’re promptly turned off by the aesthetics of it.</p>
<p>There is no substitute for the experience of the first five minutes of using any piece of software, and if Ubuntu is going to convince people to give it a chance, it needs to be more attractive by default than it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2010/03/03/the-new-ubuntu-lucid-look-an-appraisal/#comment-22843</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 09:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=2480#comment-22843</guid>
		<description>Okay, I&#039;m lazy and I only half-read the comments...but for the average user...they don&#039;t care. Just saying. I&#039;m only a little bit above the average user, but I don&#039;t look at the design like you do. I just customize it to my liking. :) And yes, I know it&#039;s been a while since you&#039;re typed this blog, but I wanted to get my opinion out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I’m lazy and I only half-read the comments…but for the average user…they don’t care. Just saying. I’m only a little bit above the average user, but I don’t look at the design like you do. I just customize it to my liking. :) And yes, I know it’s been a while since you’re typed this blog, but I wanted to get my opinion out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.534 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-01-27 09:59:55 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
