<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu, Font Hinting, &amp; You: A Cautionary Tale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/</link>
	<description>A blog about Ubuntu, typography, and contemporary technologies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: imercado</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/#comment-24544</link>
		<dc:creator>imercado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 10:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=1964#comment-24544</guid>
		<description>EXCELLENT post.  I came to this site after wondering what &quot;hinting&quot; was and I had also noticed that there wasn&#039;t nearly enough variation between the available font choices, so THANK YOU very much for clearing that up!  After using Windows and Macs for so long, I, too, was very disappointed with the &quot;Kindergarten&quot; feel of the default Ubuntu font rendering.

I agree with BATH that it&#039;s much easier (and safer) to make most of these changes in the Appearance item in the Control Center (Ubuntu 11.04).  After swapping back and forth, I found DejaVu Sans Condensed to be a great choice and it gave me slightly more screen real estate than Trebuchet MS (suggested in another blog regarding installation of the MS True Type fonts).  For me, I needed the Subpixel smoothing as opposed to the Grayscale, which doesn&#039;t work well against certain background colors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCELLENT post.  I came to this site after wondering what “hinting” was and I had also noticed that there wasn’t nearly enough variation between the available font choices, so THANK YOU very much for clearing that up!  After using Windows and Macs for so long, I, too, was very disappointed with the “Kindergarten” feel of the default Ubuntu font rendering.</p>
<p>I agree with BATH that it’s much easier (and safer) to make most of these changes in the Appearance item in the Control Center (Ubuntu 11.04).  After swapping back and forth, I found DejaVu Sans Condensed to be a great choice and it gave me slightly more screen real estate than Trebuchet MS (suggested in another blog regarding installation of the MS True Type fonts).  For me, I needed the Subpixel smoothing as opposed to the Grayscale, which doesn’t work well against certain background colors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux graphics the pits!</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/#comment-24123</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux graphics the pits!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=1964#comment-24123</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…]  […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insanity &#171; Igor&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/#comment-23811</link>
		<dc:creator>Insanity &#171; Igor&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=1964#comment-23811</guid>
		<description>[...] number of articles, forum posts and standard proposals definitely proves [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] number of articles, forum posts and standard proposals definitely proves […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Typography in Ubuntu: Part 1 · kbps</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/#comment-23233</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Typography in Ubuntu: Part 1 · kbps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=1964#comment-23233</guid>
		<description>[...] also want to stress that this is not a mat­ter of per­so­nal pre­fe­rence; unlike my insis­tence upon no hin­ting — which I admit was sub­jec­tive, but which I pla­yed up for effect — these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] also want to stress that this is not a mat­ter of per­so­nal pre­fe­rence; unlike my insis­tence upon no hin­ting — which I admit was sub­jec­tive, but which I pla­yed up for effect — these […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/#comment-22630</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=1964#comment-22630</guid>
		<description>:SHAKES FIST:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:SHAKES FIST:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walley</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/#comment-22624</link>
		<dc:creator>walley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=1964#comment-22624</guid>
		<description>fullhintig and antialias off is the way to go!:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fullhintig and antialias off is the way to go!:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/#comment-22606</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=1964#comment-22606</guid>
		<description>Good question, bluegeek.  ~/.fonts.conf is processed after the GNOME font settings, thus taking precedence over them.  So nothing should be affected by the GNOME font settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, bluegeek.  ~/.fonts.conf is processed after the GNOME font settings, thus taking precedence over them.  So nothing should be affected by the GNOME font settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluegeek</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/#comment-22605</link>
		<dc:creator>bluegeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=1964#comment-22605</guid>
		<description>How the gnome fonts settings interact with the fonts.conf settings? which one prevails? do I have to reset the gnome font settings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the gnome fonts settings interact with the fonts.conf settings? which one prevails? do I have to reset the gnome font settings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/#comment-21122</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=1964#comment-21122</guid>
		<description>Do not listen to this man!  He means to deceive you!

@Bath: Actually, choosing &quot;None&quot; in the hinting section of font appearances doesn&#039;t truly remove hinting, it only reduces it to slight.  Weird, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not listen to this man!  He means to deceive you!</p>
<p>@Bath: Actually, choosing “None” in the hinting section of font appearances doesn’t truly remove hinting, it only reduces it to slight.  Weird, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disciple of "Bob"</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2009/04/17/ubuntu-font-hinting-you-a-cautionary-tale/#comment-21120</link>
		<dc:creator>Disciple of "Bob"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/?p=1964#comment-21120</guid>
		<description>These instructions are fantastic if you enjoy text that looks like it was written on a paper towel with a felt tip pen.  If, on the other hand, you actually read text and don&#039;t just consider it decoration, you&#039;ll want to skip this and let the &quot;crispness&quot; win out over the &quot;aesthetics&quot; that gives the author the vapours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These instructions are fantastic if you enjoy text that looks like it was written on a paper towel with a felt tip pen.  If, on the other hand, you actually read text and don’t just consider it decoration, you’ll want to skip this and let the “crispness” win out over the “aesthetics” that gives the author the vapours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

