Comments on: “Substantialiscious”

By: andy

andy — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:51:44 +0000

i agree with Debra. 1. we ate it. (and it was good.) 2. someone created this site that i am assuming snickers is not a part of. 3. and most of all they succeeded because we are all talking about it.
i also will add that one of snickers does a good job. anyone remember the commercial with the football player gets a concussion and he says he is“batman”. i love that one.

By: debra

debra — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:57:55 +0000

No matter how many mistakes they made surrounding the campaign, they won. You’re not only eating snickers, you’re talking about it. Them=1, you=0. :)

By: Knocky

Knocky — Wed, 12 May 2010 16:14:04 +0000

I had no problem w/the word ‘substantialiscious’. I thought it cute. LOLOLOL

By: Gail/Ben

Gail/Ben — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:33:47 +0000

First we want to say THANK YOU we as co-workers had a good time with our spouses determining the meaning of the word we choose substantialicious as in “delicious”… Thanks

By: kristen

kristen — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:48:36 +0000

I just noticed the same thing and googled it to see if anyone at Snickers had issued an apology for spelling their stupid portmanteau wrong, and then identifying it as a noun when it’s obviously an adjective. I can’t believe this. I would return my Snickers bar to the vending machine, but alas, I’ve already eaten it.

By: Jay

Jay — Tue, 20 May 2008 05:40:02 +0000

inorite Hey after Googling I found a far more robust and academic discussion of this pressing commercialinguacular matter here. I had no idea these ads were almost two years old!

By: katie t.

katie t. — Tue, 20 May 2008 04:58:43 +0000

yeah, i saw that on a wrapper. way to ruin my appetite, snickers! what the hell!