<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FFmpeg Quality&#160;Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/05/24/ffmpeg-quality-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/05/24/ffmpeg-quality-comparison/</link>
	<description>A blog about Destroyer, foobar2000, and Last.fm.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kebvin</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/05/24/ffmpeg-quality-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-12584</link>
		<dc:creator>Kebvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/05/24/ffmpeg-quality-comparison/#comment-12584</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this! Saved me a bunch of time doing it all on my own.  I still want to investigate the effects of changing the picture size when using qscale to try and get the best quality when encoding dvd resolution videos.  Will post here if I get around to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this! Saved me a bunch of time doing it all on my own.  I still want to investigate the effects of changing the picture size when using qscale to try and get the best quality when encoding dvd resolution videos.  Will post here if I get around to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/05/24/ffmpeg-quality-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4999</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/05/24/ffmpeg-quality-comparison/#comment-4999</guid>
		<description>I ought to have done this for myself a long time ago anyway.  Of course it depends on the file you're encoding, but this tends to work:

&lt;div class="code"&gt;ffmpeg.exe -y -i input.avi -f flv -qscale 5 -r 25 -ar 44100 -ab 96 -s 500x374 output.flv&lt;/div&gt;

Full FFmpeg documentation can be found &lt;a href="http://ffmpeg.mplayerhq.hu/ffmpeg-doc.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ought to have done this for myself a long time ago anyway.  Of course it depends on the file you&#8217;re encoding, but this tends to work:</p>
<div class="code">ffmpeg.exe -y -i input.avi -f flv -qscale 5 -r 25 -ar 44100 -ab 96 -s 500&#215;374 output.flv</div>
<p>Full FFmpeg documentation can be found <a href="http://ffmpeg.mplayerhq.hu/ffmpeg-doc.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julius</title>
		<link>http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/05/24/ffmpeg-quality-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-3327</link>
		<dc:creator>Julius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilobitspersecond.com/2007/05/24/ffmpeg-quality-comparison/#comment-3327</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to do this, I was looking for exactly and just this information. Could you post the commandline in total that you'd be using for a -qscale 5 or 9 encode?

I'm also looking into doing VBR audio for flv with something like:
-acodec libmp3lame -aq 8 -ar 44100 -ac 2
Lame is actually doing much better at this variable rate (~99kbit/s) than any aac suitable for FLV1, even the nero one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to do this, I was looking for exactly and just this information. Could you post the commandline in total that you&#8217;d be using for a -qscale 5 or 9 encode?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also looking into doing VBR audio for flv with something like:<br />
-acodec libmp3lame -aq 8 -ar 44100 -ac 2<br />
Lame is actually doing much better at this variable rate (~99kbit/s) than any aac suitable for FLV1, even the nero one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
